site stats

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

WebOn January 4, 1956, plaintiff Philippine Airlines Employees' Association — otherwise known as the PALEA — whose members are regular employees of defendant … WebSep 27, 2010 · The Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA), represented by its hold-over president Alexander O. Barrientos, appeals the decision rendered on …

Civ Pro-Case Digests - RULE 1 (16) Alonso v. Villamor, 16

WebJul 6, 2012 · Philippine Air Lines, Inc., 70 SCRA 244 (1976) invoked by the claimants in G.R. Nos. 104911-14 is inapplicable to the cases at bench ( Rollo, p. 21). The said case … WebPAL VS NLRC 225 SCRA 301 (1993) FACTS: On March 15, 1985, the Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) completely revised its 1966 Code of Discipline. The Code was circulated … snorkeling punta cana dominican republic https://charlotteosteo.com

Case Digest: Rodriguez et al. v. PAL (January 11, 2016)

WebJul 4, 2024 · Petitioner: PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL) Respondents: NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION (NLRC), LABOR ARBITER ISABEL P. ORTIGUERA, and PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA) DOCTRINE: Indeed, industrial peace cannot be achieved if the employees are denied their just participation in … WebThe Philippine Airlines Employees Association (PALEA) filed a complaint before t he National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC). PALEA contended that PAL, by its unilateral implementation of the Code, was guilty of unfair labor practice, spec ifically Paragraphs E and G of Article 249 and Article 253 of the Labor Code. WebFirst Philippine International Bank, et al. v. Court of Appeals, et al., 252 SCRA 259 (1996). Five-Star Bus Company, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 313 SCRA 367 (1999). Lo Sui v. snorkeling pompano beach fl

EN BANC [G.R. No. 155001. May 5, 2003] DEMOSTHENES …

Category:CADALIN V. ASIA BUILDER (1994) - Blogger

Tags:Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

32 Palea Vs Pal 70 Scra 244 PDF - Scribd

WebAug 13, 1993 · PALEA alleged that copies of the Code had been circulated in limited numbers; that being penal in nature the Code must conform with the requirements of sufficient publication, and that the Code was arbitrary, oppressive, and prejudicial to the rights of the employees. WebApr 3, 2024 · 7/28/2024 PAL v. PALEA. 1/3. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INCORPORATED vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION(PALEA), respondent. Facts: On 6 …

Palea v. philippine airlines 70 scra 244 1976

Did you know?

WebPetitioners and petitioners-in-intervention filed the instant petitions for prohibition under Rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court seeking to prohibit the Manila International Airport Authority (MIAA) and the Department of Transportation and Communications (DOTC) and its Secretary from implementing the following agreements executed by the … WebPhilippine Airlines, Inc. vs. NLRC. SO ORDERED. (p. 40, Rollo.) PAL appealed to the NLRC. On August 19, 1988, the NLRC through Commissioner Encarnacion, with Presiding Commissioner Bonto-Perez and Commissioner Maglaya concurring, found no evidence of unfair labor practice committed by PAL and affirmed the dismissal of PALEA’s charge.

WebJan 20, 2009 · This Court has repeatedly held that execution is the final stage of litigation, 20 the fruit and end of the suit. 21 Thus, the proceedings before the RTC were not terminated by the filing of the appeal to the CA. The same could not be executed - hence, not yet terminated - until the appeal is decided with finality. WebJul 23, 2008 · WHEREFORE, premises considered, this Office renders judgment declaring that Philippine Airlines, Inc., illegally retrenched One Thousand Four Hundred (1,400) …

WebPALEA, as the winner in that election, was certified by the BLR as the exclusive bargaining agent of all the rank-and-file employee of the Philippine Airlines, Inc. PALEA and PAL signed a 3-year collective bargaining agreement effective October 1, … WebPHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., petitioner ... PALEA filed another grievance asking for lifting of, or at least, holding in abeyance the execution of said penalty. The said grievance was forthwith denied but the penalty of suspension with respect to respondent Ramos was modified, such that his suspension which was originally from January 15, 1985 to ...

WebPHILIPPINE AIRLINES EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION (PALEA) ET AL. v. NLRC, PAL, and GSIS In relation to the first case (PALEA and PALSA v. PAL), PAL was ordered to pay …

WebEspiritu, 22 after Philippine Airlines (PAL) and PAL Employees Association (PALEA) entered into an agreement, which includes the provision to suspend the PAL-PALEA CBA for 10 years, several employees questioned its validity via a petition for certiorari directly to the Supreme Court. snorkeling south shore kauaiWebJul 8, 2024 · Philippine Airlines, Inc. [PAL] Vs. Philippine Airlines Employees Association [PALEAJ], Eugene Soriano, et al./Renato Ebio, et al. Vs. PALEA and Eugene Soriano/PALEA and Eugene Soriano Vs. Renato Ebio, et al. G.R. No. 243460/G.R. No. 243486/G.R. No. 243528. July 8, 2024 snorkeling spots in southwest floridaWebOn February 14, 1963, the Philippine Air Lines Employees' Association (PALEA) and the Philippine Air Lines Supervisors' Association (PALSA) — petitioners in G.R. No. L … snorkeling the dogs bviWebGPA Law Office and Associates snorkeling sunshine coastWebFeb 20, 2024 · Illegal dismissal case of Philippine Airlines pilots who allegedly joined a strike and failed to report to work in compliance with DOLE's return-to-work order. The Supreme Court declared as valid the dismissal of Philippine Airlines pilots except for one, who was found to be on maternity leave. Her snorkeling tour airlie beachWebNov 17, 2013 · PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., respondents. FACTS: THIS case portrays the peculiar story of an international flight steward who was dismissed because of his failure to adhere to the weight standards of the airline company. snorkeling spots in the philippinesWebARMANDO G. YRASUEGUI, petitioners, vs. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC., respondents. G. No. 168081, October 17, 2008 (569 SCRA 467) VERSION 1: FACTS: THIS case portrays the peculiar story of an international flight steward who was dismissed because of his failure to adhere to the weight standards of the airline company. snorkeling tour catalina island